Repositorio Dspace

Recuento crítico de la literatura sobre los impactos de la investigación y sus indicadores

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author Zambrano, Jorge Andrés
dc.contributor.author Jaramillo Salazar, Hernán
dc.contributor.author Forero Pineda, Clemente
dc.date.accessioned 2016-04-12T13:31:06Z
dc.date.available 2016-04-12T13:31:06Z
dc.date.created 2002
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11146/87
dc.description El presente capítulo se centra en el estudio de los impactos sociales de la investigación y en la medición de estos impactos. El estudio del impacto de la actividad investigativa admite distintas secciones: las múltiples definiciones de los sistemas de innovación y del impacto de dichos sistemas; la visión institucionalista de los sistemas de innovación; la evaluación de impactos de la investigación; el nuevo enfoque que se está dando al análisis de los impactos, centrado en la formación de redes; y el debate sobre el impacto de la investigación en ciencias básicas y la justificación para su financiación. En una sección final nos referimos a la literatura existente sobre las formas de medir los impactos de la investigación a través de indicadores. es_CO
dc.description.sponsorship Colombia. Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Colciencias es_CO
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf es_CO
dc.language.iso spa es_CO
dc.subject Investigación -- Aspectos sociales es_CO
dc.subject Impacto científico es_CO
dc.subject Impacto tecnológico es_CO
dc.subject Impacto científico -- Fuentes es_CO
dc.subject.other Impact es_CO
dc.subject.other Science indicators es_CO
dc.subject.other Research -- Social aspects es_CO
dc.title Recuento crítico de la literatura sobre los impactos de la investigación y sus indicadores es_CO
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart es_CO
dc.publisher.editor COLCIENCIAS es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Abramovitz, M.A, David P.A. “Convergence and deferred catch-up: Productivity Leadership and the Waning of American Exceptionalism”. CEPR Publication No 401. Stanford University, Stanford, 1994. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Collins, Harry. Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Callon, Michel. “Le réseau comme forme émergente et comme modalité de coordination: le cas des interactions stratégiques entre firmes industrielles et laboratoires académiques”. En Réseau et Coordination. Michel Callon, Cohendet, Curien, Dalle Eymard-Duvernay, Foray & Schenk. Paris: Economica, 1999. 13-64. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Abramovitz, M.A. “Catching up, forging ahead and falling behind”. Journal of Economic History, no 46 (1986): 385-406. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Aghion, P y Howitt, P. Endogeneus Growth Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Arora, A. y Gambardella, A. “The Impact of NSF Support for Basic Research in Economics”. 1998. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation ASIF Team. Assessing the Socio-economics Impacts of the Framework Programme. Manchester: PREST, University of Manchester, 2002. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Banze, C. E. “A especificidade e a diversidade do continente africano: uma sugestão inicial de tipologias de sistemas nacionais de inovação”. Monografia de Graduação, Belo Horizonte, FACE-UFMG, 2000. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Beggs, J. “Long-Run Trends in Patenting”. En R&D, Patents, and Productivity. Zvi Griliches, editor. Chicago y London: The University of Chicago Press, 1984. 155-174. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Bernard, Anne. “IDRC Networks: An Ethnographic Perspective”. International Development Research Centre, 1996. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Bernardes, A. y Albuquerque, E. “Cross-over, thresholds, and interactions between science and technology: lessons for less-developed countries”. Research Policy 32 (2003): 865-885. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Blair, Cameron. “Evaluating research and development performance”. Mem Desk Research, 1999. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Bozeman, B. “Peer review and evaluation of R&D impacts”. En Evaluating R&D impacts: Methods and practice. B. Bozeman y J. Melkers, editores. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Brown, Martin. “Cost/benefit analysis of large scale S&T projects: notes on some methodological issues”. Trabajo para Megascience: The OECD Forum, París, 1995. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Calvert, J., y Martin, B. “Changing conceptions of basic research”. Documento para el Workshop on Policy Relevance and Measurement of Basic Research, Oslo, 2001. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Capron, H., y Cincera M. “Assessing the institutional set up of national innovation systems”. Universidad Libre de Bruselas, Bruselas. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Carlsson, B., Jacobsson, S., Holmén, M. y Rickne, A. “Innovation systems. Analytical and methodological issues”. Research Policy, no. 31 (2002): 233-245. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Cassiman, B. Perez-Castrillo, D. y Veugelers, R. “Endogeneizing know-how flows trough the nature R&D investment”. Paper presented 1er World Congress of the Game Theory Society, Bilbao and the EARIC, Conference Lausanne, 2000. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Charnes, A., Cooper W. W. y Ferguson R. “Optimal estimation of executive compensation by linear programming”. Management Science 1, (1955): 138-151. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Coriat, B., y Weinstein, O. “Organizations, firms and institutions in the generation of innovation”. Research Policy, no. 31 (2002): 273-290. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Cozzens, S. E. “Assessment of Fundamental Science programs in the Context of the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA)”. Rand Domestic Research Division Report. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation, 1995. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation a Motta e Albuquerque y Tristao Bernardes. “Cross-over, thresholds, and interactions between science and technology: a tentative simplified model and initial notes about statistics from 120 countries”. Texto para discussion No. 157, Universidade Federal De Minas Gerais, Faculdade De Ciências Económicas, Centro De Desenvolvimento E Planejamento Regional, Belo Horizonte, 2001. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Dixit, A. “Some Lessons from Transaction-Cost Politics for Less-Developed Countries”. Working paper, Princeton University, 2001. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Englander, A.S, Evenson, R. y Hanazaki, M. “R&D, Innovation and the Total factor Productivity Slowdown”. OECD Econ. Stu. 11, (1988): 8-42. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Engle R. F. y Granger C. W. J. “Co-Integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing. Econometrica 55, no. 2 (1987): 251-276. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Evenson, R. “International Invention: Implications for Technology Market Analysis”. En R&D, Patents, and Productivity. Zvi Griliches, editor. Chicago y London: The University of Chicago Press, 1984. 73-88. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Freeman, Chris. “Continental, national and sub-national innovation systemscomplementarity and economic growth”. Research Policy, no. 31 (2002): 191-211 es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Godin, B. y Doré C. “Measuring the Impacts of Science: Beyond the Economic Dimension”. 2003 es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Granger C. W. J. “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods”. Econometrica 37, no. 2 (1969): 424-438. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Griliches, Z., Nordhaus W. y Scherer F. M. “Patents: Recent Trends and Puzzles”. Brooking Papers on Economic Activity. Microeconomics 1989 (1989): 291-330 es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Griliches, Zvi. “Introduction”. En R&D, Patents, and Productivity. Zvi Griliches, editor. Chicago y London: The University of Chicago Press, 1984. 1-20. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Griliches, Zvi. “Patents Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey”. Journal of Economic Literature 28, no. 4 (1990), 1661-1707 es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Griliches, Zvi. R&D, Patents, and Productivity. Editor. A NBER Conference Report. Chicago y London: The University of Chicago Press, 1984. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Harris, R.I.D. Using Cointegration Analysis in Econometric Modeling. Prentice Hall, 1995. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Hicks, Esther. Flows of Scientific Information: S/N, S/S, N/S Working Paper. Faculty of Management and Organization, University of Groningen, The Netherlands, 1995. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Katz, Sylvan. “Scale-Independent Indicators and Research Evaluation”. Paper No. 41, SPRU, University of Sussex, forthcoming Science and Public Policy, Brighton, 2000. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation lpatrick, Henry. “Some Useful Methods for Measuring the Benefits of Social Science Research”. Impact Assessment Discussion Paper No. 5, Washington, 1998. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Kingsley, G. “The Use of Case Studies in R&D Impact Evaluations”. En Evaluating R&D Impacts: Methods and Practice. B. Bozeman y J. Melkers, editores. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Langford, Cooper. “Measuring the Impact of University Research on Innovation”. Science, Technology, and Society Program. Faculty of General Studies, University of Calgary, Calgary. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Link, Albert. “Economic Impact Assessments: Guidelines for conducting and interpreting assessment studies”. 1996. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Lundvall, B., Johnson, B., Andersen, E., Dalum, B. “National systems of production, innovation and competence building”. Research Policy, no. 31 (2002): 213- 231. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Malerba, Franco. “Sectoral systems of innovation and production”. Research Policy, no. 31 (2002): 247-264. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Mansfield E. (1998), ‘Academic Research and Industrial Innovation: an Update of Empirical Findings’, Research Policy, 26, pp. 773-776. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Merewitz, L. y Sosnick S. H. “The Budget´s New Clothes”. Chicago: Markham Publishing Co, 1971. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Mullin, J., Adam, R., Halliwell, J., Milligen, L. “Science, Technology, and Innovation in Chile”. Pub licado por IDRC, 2000. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Nelson, R., y Nelson K. “Technology, institutions, and innovation systems”. Research Policy, no.31 (2002): 265-272. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Niosi, Jorge. “National systems of innovations are “x-efficient” (and x-effective). Why some are slow learners”. Research Policy, no. 31 (2002): 291-302. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation OCDE. “The evaluation of scientific research: selected experiences”. París, 1997. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Ohmae, K.. “The Borderless World. Harper”. New York, 1990. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Pakes, A. y Griliches, Z. “Patents and R&D at the Firm Level: A First Look”. En R&D, Patents, and Productivity. Zvi Griliches, editor. Chicago y London: The University of Chicago Press, 1984. 21-54. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Pakes, A. y Schankerman, M. “The Rate of Obsolescence of Patents, Research Gestation Lags, and the Private Rate of Return to Rsearch Resources”. En R&D, Patents, and Productivity. Zvi Griliches, editor. Chicago y London: The University of Chicago Press, 1984. 55-72. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Pakes, A. y Schankerman, M.. “An Exploration into the Determinants of Research Intensity”. En R&D, Patents, and Productivity. Zvi Griliches, editor. Chicago y London: The University of Chicago Press, 1984. 209-232. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Pakes, Ariel. “Patents, R&D, and the stock market rate of return”. NBER Working Paper no. 786, Cambridge, Mass: NBER, 1981. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Pavitt, Keith. “Knowledge about knowledge since Nelson & Winter: a mixed record”. Paper No. 83, Electronic Working Paper Series, SPRU, Brighton, 2002. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Popper, S. W. “Economic Approaches to Measuring the Performance and Benefits of Fundamental Science”. Rand Domestic Research Division Report, Santa Monica, 1995. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Rapini, M. S. “Uma investigação sobre a relação de Granger-causalidade entre ciência e tecnologia para países em catching up e para o Brasil”. Monografia de Graduação. Belo Horizonte: FACE-UFMG, 2000 es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Ryan, James. “Synthesis Report of Workshop on Assessing the Impact of PolicyOriented Social Science Research in Scheveningen, the Netherlands November 12-13, 2002”. Impact Assessment Discussion Paper No. 15, Washington, 2002. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Salter, A. y Martin, B. “The Economic Benefits of Publicly Funded Basic Research: A Critical Review”. Working Paper # 34, SPRU Electronic Working Paper Series, Brighton, UK, 1999. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Sander, Cerstin. “Development research impact: reach”. Artículo para la presentación en el ICRAF International Workshop on Assessing Impacts in Natural Resource Management Research, Nairobi, 1998. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Sanz Menéndez, Luis. “Indicadores Relacionales y Redes Sociales en el Estudio de los Efectos de las Políticas de Ciencia y Tecnología”. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Unidad de Políticas Comparadas, SPRITTE, 2001. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Sarafoglou, N. y Haynes K. E. “University Productivity in Sweden: A Demonstration and Explanatory Analysis for Economics and Business Programs”. The Annals of Regional Science 30, (1996): 285-304. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Schankerman M. y Pakes, A. “Estimates of the Value of Patent Rights in European Countries During the Post-1950 Period”. The Economic Journal 96, no. 384 (1986), 1052- 1076. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Schmookler, Jacob. Invention and Economic Growth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1966. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Smith, Vincent. “Measuring the Benefits of Social Science Research”. Impact Assessment Discussion Paper No. 2, Washington, 1998. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Swann, Meter. “Funding Basic Research: When is public finance preferable to attainable club good solutions?”. Final draft forthcoming in Science and Innovation: Rethinking the Rationales for Funding and Governance. A. Geuna, A. Salter y W.E. Steinmueller, editors, 2002. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Toole, Andrew. “The Impact of Public Basic Research on Industrial Innovation: Evidence from de Pharmaceutical Industry”. SIEPR Discussion Paper No. 00-07, Stanford, 2000. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Velho, L. “The author and the beholder: how paradigm commitments can influence the interpretation of research results. Scientometrics 11, (1987): 59-70. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Viotti, E.B. “Pasive and Active National Learning Systems”. PhD. Dissertation. New School for Social Research, 1997. es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitation Yin, R. K. “Case Study Research: Design and Methods”. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1989. es_CO
dc.rights.accesRights info:eu-repo/semantic/openAccess es_CO
dc.date.embargoEnd info:eu-repo/date/embargoEnd/2024-01-31 es_CO
dc.type.hasversion info:eu-repo/repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_CO


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem