Repositorio Dspace
Comparative Analysis for Science, Technology and Innovation Policy; Lessons Learned from Some Selected Countries (Brazil, India, China, South Korea and South Africa) for Other LdCs Like Iran
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
| dc.contributor.author | Salami, Reza
|
|
| dc.contributor.author | Soltanzadeh, Javad
|
|
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-05-17T03:40:56Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2016-05-17T03:40:56Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2012-03-13 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11146/514 | |
| dc.description | "Having recognized the importance of designing Science, Technology and Innovation policies (STIP), many Less Developed Countries (LDCs) such as Iran have nowadays attempt to reshape their STI policies. The policy makers of LDCs like Iran can adopt and design suitable strategies learning from the successful experiences of prosperous nations. This paper performs a comparative analysis of STI policies of some successful countries in managing their technological change. This is mostly due to the fact that the other LDCs can draw valuable lessons from these success stories which in turn can also contribute to success in their own short and long term development. Firstly, the empirical experiences of some successful nations namely (Brazil, India, China, South Africa and South Korea) will be studied. The empirical experience in STI policymaking will be surveyed. The most critical success factors contributed mostly to their management of STI policies will also be compared. Finally, a general framework of STI policymaking drawing from the experiences of these countries will be proposed for other LDCs like Iran." | es_CO |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Journal of Technology Management & Innovation | es_CO |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | es_CO |
| dc.language.iso | eng | es_CO |
| dc.subject | Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación | es_CO |
| dc.subject | Política Científica y Tecnológica | es_CO |
| dc.subject | Análisis comparativo | es_CO |
| dc.subject | Irán | es_CO |
| dc.subject.other | Science & Technology | es_CO |
| dc.subject.other | Science and state | es_CO |
| dc.subject.other | Technology and innovation policy | es_CO |
| dc.subject.other | Comparative analysis | es_CO |
| dc.title | Comparative Analysis for Science, Technology and Innovation Policy; Lessons Learned from Some Selected Countries (Brazil, India, China, South Korea and South Africa) for Other LdCs Like Iran | es_CO |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_CO |
| dc.publisher.editor | Journal of Technology Management & Innovation; 2012, Volume 7, Issue 1 | es_CO |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | AMMAN, E., & Baer, W. (2002). The Development of Brazil’sTechnology Capabilities in the post war period. Latin American Business Review , 3 (1), 1-29. | es_CO |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | BARNES, J., Bessant, J., Dunne, N., & Mor, M. (2001). Developing manufacturing competitiveness within South African industry: the role of middle management. Technovation , 21 (5), 293-309. | es_CO |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | BARTzOKAS, A. (2008). Monitoring and analysis of policies and public financing instruments conducive to higher levels of R&D investments The “POLICY MIX” Project Country Review Korea. Maastricht, The Netherlands: United Nations University. | es_CO |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | BRANSCOMB, L. (1993). U.S. SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY: ISSUES FOR THE 1990s. Cambridge: Harvard University. | es_CO |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | CHAKRABORTY, C., & Nunnenkamp, P. (2008). Economic Reforms, FDI, and Economic Growth in India: A Sector Level Analysis. World development , 36 (7), 1192-1212. | es_CO |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | CHOW, G. (2002). China’s Economic Transformation . Oxford : Blackwell Publishing, 2002. | es_CO |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | CHUNG, S. (2003). Innovation in Korea. In L. V. Shavinina, The International Handbook on Innovation (pp. 890- 903). Oxford: Pergamon | es_CO |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | DAYASINDHU, N., & Chandrashekar, S. (2005). Indian remote sensing program: A national system of innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change , 72 (3), 287-299 | es_CO |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | FAGERBERG, J., Srholec, M., & Knell, M. (2007). The Competitiveness of Nations: Why Some Countries Prosper While Others Fall Behind. World Dvelopment , 35 (10), 1595–1620. | es_CO |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | FAN, P., & Watanabe, C. (2006). Promoting industrial development through technology policy: Lessons from Japan and China. Technology in Society , 28 (3), 303-320 | es_CO |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | GORE, C. (2000). The Rise and Fall of the Washington Consensus as a Paradigm for Developing Countries. World Development , 28 (5), 789-804. | es_CO |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | HAK EUN, J., Lee, K., & Wu, G. (2006). Explaining the “University-run enterprises” in China: A theoretical framework for university–industry relationship in developing countries and its application to China. Research Policy , 1329–1346. | es_CO |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | HIPKIN, I., & Bennett, D. (2003). Managerial perceptions of factors influencing technology management in South Africa. Technovation , 23 (9), 719-735. | es_CO |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | KIM, L., & Dahlman, C. J. (1992). Technology policy for industrialization: An integrative framework and Korea’s experience. Research Policy , 21 (5), 437-452. | es_CO |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | KRISHNAN, R. T. (2003). The Evolution of a Developing Country Innovation System During Economic Liberalization:The Case of India. The First Globelics Conference | es_CO |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | LALL, S. (1995). The Creation Of Comaprative Advantage: Role of Industrial Policy. In I. Haque, Trade, Technology and industrial Competitivness (pp. 103-134). New York: World Bank | es_CO |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | LUNDVALL,B.-Å., & Borrás, S. (2004). Science, Technology and Innovation Policy. In D. C. J. Fagerberg, The Oxford Hand Book Of Innovation (pp. 599-631). London: Oxford Press. | es_CO |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | METCALFE, J. (2005). science, technology and innovation policy. In G. Wignaraja, Competitiveness strategy in developing countries (pp. 95-130). New York: Routledge pub.LTD | es_CO |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | MICHELSON, E. S. (2008). Globalization at the nano frontier: The future of nanotechnology policy in the United States, China, and India. Technology in Societ , 30 (3-4), 405-410. | es_CO |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | NELSON, R., & Rosenborg, N. (1993). Technologyical in novation and National Systems. In R. Nelson, National Innovation Systems. A Comparative Analysis (pp. 3-22). New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press. | es_CO |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | OECD. (2005). Innovation Policy And Performance A Cross-Country Comparison. Paris: Oecd. | es_CO |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | OECD. (2006). OECD Science, Technology and Industy Outlook. Paris: Organization For Economic Co-Opera tion And Development. | es_CO |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | PARKA, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Longitudinal trends in networks of university–industry–government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic in centives. ScienceDirect , 39, 640–649. | es_CO |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | PEREIRA, Jose Matias et al.. (2006). Brazilian New Patterns of an Industrial, Technological and Foreign Trade Policy, Journal of Technology Management & Innovation,vol.1 issue 3.17-28. | es_CO |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | RATCHFORD, J. T., & Blanpied, W. A. (2008). Paths to the future for science and technology in China, India and the United States. Technology in Society , 30 (3-4), 211-233. | es_CO |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | RONGPING, M., & Wan, Q. (2008). The development of science and technology in China: A comparison with India and the United States. Technology in Society , 30 (3-4). | es_CO |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | SALAMI, R. (2008). Reshaping and Reforming National Innovation System toward Knowledge Based economic. SLPTMD Conference. | es_CO |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | SONG, J. (2008). Awakening: Evolution of China’s science and technology policies. Technology in Society , 30 (3-4), 235-241. | es_CO |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | THROPE, C. (2007). Political Theory in Science and Technology Studies. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, & J. Wajcman, The Handbook Of Science & Technology Studies. London, England: MIT Press. | es_CO |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | UNCTAD. (2005). Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Review The Islamic Republic of Iran. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development | es_CO |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | VERSPAGEN. (1991). A new empirical approach to catching up or falling behind. 2 (2). | es_CO |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | VIOTTI, E. B. (2002). National Learning Systems: A new approach on technological change in late industrializing economies and evidences from the cases of Brazil and South Korea. Technological Forecasting and Social Change , 653-680. | es_CO |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | WALCOTT, S. M. (2002). Chinese Industrial and Science Parks: Bridging the Gap. The Professional Geographer , 54 (3), 349-364. | es_CO |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | WEF. (2010). World Competitiveness Report. Geneva: World Economic Forum. | es_CO |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | WORLD BANK. (2009). Annual Report 2009. New York: World Bank | es_CO |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | WORLD BANK. (2010). Brazil Data. Retrieved from world bank: www.worldbank.org | es_CO |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | XIWEI, Z., & Xiangdong, Y. (2007). Science and technology policy reform and its impact on China ’ s national innovation system. Technology in Society , 317-325. | es_CO |
| dc.rights.accesRights | info:eu-repo/semantic/openAccess | es_CO |
| dc.date.embargoEnd | info:eu-repo/date/embargoEnd/2024-01-31 | es_CO |
| dc.type.hasversion | info:eu-repo/repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_CO |
